1. Was it possible to establish a state called Azawad since 1958?
Yes, it was absolutely possible.
1958 was a pivotal moment for all of Africa, as many countries were liberated from colonialism.
If Algeria—or any other neighboring country—had wanted to support the creation of an Azawad entity, the path would have been paved at that time.
But the reality? The region was left to its fate, between French marginalization and the complicity of some countries that feared “liberal contagion.”
2. In 2012, when the National Movement for the Liberation of Azawad declared its independence… did Algeria support it?
The short answer: No.
Algeria did not support Azawad’s independence; quite the opposite:
It hosted peace talks, but always called for “autonomy” rather than “independence.”
It created and supported rival movements to the MNLA (such as armed groups based on religion or tribe), with the aim of dividing the Azawad people.
She expressed her fear that the establishment of an Azawad state would encourage the Tuareg in southern Algeria to demand their rights, and perhaps even more.
3. Are there economic motives?
Of course.
Algeria is rich in resources, but its south is extremely sensitive and constitutes a natural extension of Azawad territory (culturally and geographically).
Any stability or “success model” in Azawad would encourage the inhabitants of these regions to demand a comprehensive reform of the management of their wealth and lands.
For the Algerian regime, this represents an intolerable economic and strategic threat.
Conclusion:
Algeria is a central country that likes to play the role of mediator, but without losing its control.
For it, the establishment of an Azawad state is like a fire under the ashes within its borders.
Thus, every step toward Azawad’s independence is met with a counter-step from Algeria… often in the name of “regional stability.”
Azawad Freedom Voice
10-04-25
EN_GB 
FR 
AR